alternative concessive conditional strategy (str)

Type strategy
http://example.org/cx/hasExample Whether he is right or not, we must support him
Definition a strategy for expressing a concessive conditional construction where the protasis, which specifies the set of conditions for the concessive conditional, invokes the two polar alternatives possible in the scalar model; the apodosis expresses the unexpected opposite of the expected causal relation between either alternative and the outcome, and so implies the same outcome no matter what. Example: Whether he is right or not, we must support him uses the alternative concessive conditional strategy -- either he is right or he is wrong, and under either of those conditions that make up the scalar model, we must support him. (Section 17.3.3)
See section (in Croft 2022) 17.3.3
expressionOf concessive conditional construction
Subtype of encoding strategy

Source

The Model of Comparative concepts for Constructicon Alignment (MoCCA; Lorenzi et al. 2024) proposes to connect constructions across and within languages using Comparative Concepts as a shared base of comparison. It adopts the set of Comparative Concepts provided by Croft (2022).

Croft, William. 2022. Morphosyntax: Constructions of the World’s Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/highereducation/books/morphosyntax/1AAB4F5F9C553F675170DCA3F03F82E2#contents. (14 October, 2025).
Lorenzi, Arthur, Peter Ljunglöf, Ben Lyngfelt, Tiago Timponi Torrent, William Croft, Alexander Ziem, Nina Böbel, Linnéa Bäckström, Peter Uhrig & Ely E Matos. 2024. MoCCA: A Model of Comparative Concepts for Aligning Constructicons. In Proceedings of the 20th Joint ACL - ISO Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation @ LREC-COLING 2024, 93–98. Torino, Italia: ELRA and ICCL. https://aclanthology.org/2024.isa-1.12/. (22 July, 2025).

You can consult this entry in the original database here.

Back to list of Comparative Concepts