| Type | strategy |
|---|---|
| Definition | a system defined by the co-expression of arguments of predicates in intransitive, transitive, and ditransitive constructions. Example: English expresses the one argument of an intransitive verb construction (The cats slept) in the same way as the semantically agentive argument of a transitive verb (The cats clawed the sofa): both arguments are expressed preceding the verb. (Sections 1.4, 6.3.1) |
| altLabel | alignment (strategy) |
| See section (in Croft 2022) | 1.4 |
| See section (in Croft 2022) | 6.3.1 |
| Subtype of | system |
The Model of Comparative concepts for Constructicon Alignment (MoCCA; Lorenzi et al. 2024) proposes to connect constructions across and within languages using Comparative Concepts as a shared base of comparison. It adopts the set of Comparative Concepts provided by Croft (2022).
Croft, William. 2022. Morphosyntax: Constructions of the World’s Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/highereducation/books/morphosyntax/1AAB4F5F9C553F675170DCA3F03F82E2#contents. (14 October, 2025).
Lorenzi, Arthur, Peter Ljunglöf, Ben Lyngfelt, Tiago Timponi Torrent, William Croft, Alexander Ziem, Nina Böbel, Linnéa Bäckström, Peter Uhrig & Ely E Matos. 2024. MoCCA: A Model of Comparative Concepts for Aligning Constructicons. In Proceedings of the 20th Joint ACL - ISO Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation @ LREC-COLING 2024, 93–98. Torino, Italia: ELRA and ICCL. https://aclanthology.org/2024.isa-1.12/. (22 July, 2025).
You can consult this entry in the original database here.