| Type | meaning |
|---|---|
| Definition | the speaker's commitment to the actuality of the proposition expressed in a clause. Epistemic stance is normally presupposed. Epistemic stance is divided by Fillmore (1990b) into three categories: positive, neutral, and negative. Others use a finer-grained categorization (e.g., partial positive and partial negative), and still others refer to a continuum of hypotheticality. Non-positive (i.e., neutral and negative) epistemic stances are referred to as hypothetical. (Section 17.3.1) |
| altLabel | hypotheticality |
| See section (in Croft 2022) | 17.3.1 |
The Model of Comparative concepts for Constructicon Alignment (MoCCA; Lorenzi et al. 2024) proposes to connect constructions across and within languages using Comparative Concepts as a shared base of comparison. It adopts the set of Comparative Concepts provided by Croft (2022).
Croft, William. 2022. Morphosyntax: Constructions of the World’s Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/highereducation/books/morphosyntax/1AAB4F5F9C553F675170DCA3F03F82E2#contents. (14 October, 2025).
Lorenzi, Arthur, Peter Ljunglöf, Ben Lyngfelt, Tiago Timponi Torrent, William Croft, Alexander Ziem, Nina Böbel, Linnéa Bäckström, Peter Uhrig & Ely E Matos. 2024. MoCCA: A Model of Comparative Concepts for Aligning Constructicons. In Proceedings of the 20th Joint ACL - ISO Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation @ LREC-COLING 2024, 93–98. Torino, Italia: ELRA and ICCL. https://aclanthology.org/2024.isa-1.12/. (22 July, 2025).
You can consult this entry in the original database here.